VPN providers compared, with citations

A large table: providers in columns, properties in rows. If a cell has a value, it comes with a link and a date. If not, we lack the evidence. Sorting and weighting is up to you.

providers
85
criteria
158
cells with a value
6,153
sources
7,387

Some reviews belong to the provider they praise

The VPN service and the site that recommends it often sit under the same roof. Below are the groups that, according to our dataset, also own review portals:

  • AzireVPNbelongs to Malwarebytes

    none (explicitly: do not own VPN review sites)

    1 source

  • Betternetbelongs to Point Wild

    Comparitech (acquired Oct 2021 by Pango Group)

    1 source

  • CyberGhostbelongs to Kape Technologies

    vpnMentor und Wizcase über die im März 2021 übernommene Webselenese

    3 sources

  • Encrypt.mebelongs to Ziff Davis

    Ziff Davis owns PCMag, Mashable, IGN (among others)

    1 source

  • ExpressVPNbelongs to Kape Technologies

    Der Konzern übernahm im März 2021 Webselenese, den Betreiber der VPN-Vergleichsseiten vpnMentor und Wizcase, Kaufpreis 149,1 Millionen US-Dollar. Webselenese wird auf der Konzernseite als Marke geführt.

    2 sources

  • hide.mebelongs to eVenture Limited

    none disclosed on fetched pages

    1 source

  • Hotspot Shieldbelongs to Point Wild

    Comparitech (listed among Point Wild brands)

    1 source

  • NordVPNbelongs to Nord Security

    none disclosed on about page

    1 source

  • Norton VPNbelongs to Gen Digital

    Not stated on fetched Gen brand pages

    1 source

  • none documented

    1 source

  • Private Internet Accessbelongs to Kape Technologies

    Die Konzernmutter Kape Technologies fuehrt neben den VPN-Marken die Marke Webselenese, beschrieben als Portfolio von Vergleichsseiten mit datengestuetzten Inhalten zu Privatsphaere und Sicherheit. Einzelne Seitennamen nennt Kape auf der Markenseite nicht.

    1 source

  • Proton VPNbelongs to Proton Foundation

    none disclosed

    1 source

  • PureVPNbelongs to Disrupt

    none disclosed on fetched about/home pages

    1 source

  • Surfsharkbelongs to Nord Security

    none disclosed on about page

    1 source

  • TouchVPNbelongs to Point Wild

    Comparitech (acquired Oct 2021 by Pango Group)

    1 source

  • TunnelBearbelongs to McAfee

    none known from fetched official pages

    2 sources

  • UltraVPNbelongs to Point Wild

    Comparitech (acquired Oct 2021 by Pango Group)

    1 source

  • VPN360belongs to Point Wild

    Comparitech (acquired Oct 2021 by Pango Group)

    1 source

  • none disclosed on privacy/FAQ/cookie pages reviewed

    2 sources

  • none disclosed

    1 source

57 of 85 providers have a parent company on file, across 35 groups. The rest is in the matrix.

No affiliate money

Links to providers are citations, not partner links. Commission, discount code, deal: none of that.

No overall score

A 9.2 looks factual but is always someone's weighting. That is why there is no winner column here.

Source or empty

Every value needs a link and a retrieval date. If only the provider says so, it is marked as a provider claim, not independent proof.

Providers can buy a verified badge on invoice and edit their own entry. That does not move anything in the sort order. Who paid is listed on the transparency page. Income and rules

Much is only a provider claim

Some fields are hard to check from the outside, so the provider website is the source. Green and yellow in the legend show the difference.

Confidence levels explained
confirmed
1,262
provider claim
4,888
disputed
3

Ready-made filters

Six search rules from the criteria catalogue, e.g. anonymous payment or no parent company. Not a recommendation, just matches with a source.